Performance, power and 0-100 km/h
2025 Porsche Cayenne Coupe E-Hybrid has the quicker recorded 0-100 km/h time at 4.7 seconds, compared with 5.8 seconds for 2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura. 2025 Porsche Cayenne Coupe E-Hybrid has the higher listed output at 470 hp; 2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura is rated at 327 hp, a difference of 143 hp. The torque figures follow 2025 Porsche Cayenne Coupe E-Hybrid at 650 Nm and 2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura at 500 Nm. These figures describe straight-line potential only; they do not establish braking performance, ride quality, steering response or durability under repeated hard use.
Range, battery, charging and efficiency
2025 Porsche Cayenne Coupe E-Hybrid carries the longer listed range at 66 km, against 63 km for 2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura. 2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura has the lower recorded consumption at 1.5 L/100km; 2025 Porsche Cayenne Coupe E-Hybrid is listed at 1.7 L/100km. Test cycle, temperature, wheel size and charging conditions can materially affect these results, so only figures measured on the same basis should be treated as directly comparable.
Dimensions, cargo space and towing
2025 Porsche Cayenne Coupe E-Hybrid provides the larger quoted cargo volume: 592 litres versus 570 litres, a difference of 22 litres. 2025 Porsche Cayenne Coupe E-Hybrid carries the higher towing rating at 3,500 kg, while 2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura is listed at 2,500 kg. 2025 Porsche Cayenne Coupe E-Hybrid is 186 mm longer overall. Exterior size is not a benefit by itself: a longer body may create useful room, but cargo shape, rear-seat space and ease of parking still require a physical inspection.
Price and overall assessment
2025 Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Homura has the lower listed starting price at $52,500, compared with $94,400 for 2025 Porsche Cayenne Coupe E-Hybrid. 2025 Porsche Cayenne Coupe E-Hybrid leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. The assessment is based on the specifications shown here; it is not presented as a two-car road test.