Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX vs Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD

Comparison winners

5 metrics
0-100 winner Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD 4.8 s Runner-up: 6.0 s
Range winner Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD 574 km Runner-up: 75 km
Power winner Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD 351 hp Runner-up: 306 hp
Cargo winner Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD 854 L Runner-up: 490 L
Price winner Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD $45,990 Runner-up: $49,900

How the specs compare

This comparison sets the 2025 Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX against the 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD. Both belong to the SUV class, so their dimensions, performance and utility figures address a broadly similar type of car. One uses a plug-in hybrid powertrain and the other a battery-electric system, so range and consumption figures need to be read in that context.

Performance, power and 0-100 km/h

2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD has the quicker recorded 0-100 km/h time at 4.8 seconds, compared with 6.0 seconds for 2025 Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX. 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD has the higher listed output at 351 hp; 2025 Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX is rated at 306 hp, a difference of 45 hp. The torque figures follow 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD at 493 Nm and 2025 Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX at 227 Nm. These figures describe straight-line potential only; they do not establish braking performance, ride quality, steering response or durability under repeated hard use.

Range, battery, charging and efficiency

2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD carries the longer listed range at 574 km, against 75 km for 2025 Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX. Test cycle, temperature, wheel size and charging conditions can materially affect these results, so only figures measured on the same basis should be treated as directly comparable.

Dimensions, cargo space and towing

2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD provides the larger quoted cargo volume: 854 litres versus 490 litres, a difference of 364 litres. 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD carries the higher towing rating at 1,600 kg, while 2025 Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX is listed at 750 kg. 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD is 162 mm longer overall. Exterior size is not a benefit by itself: a longer body may create useful room, but cargo shape, rear-seat space and ease of parking still require a physical inspection.

Price and overall assessment

2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD has the lower listed starting price at $45,990, compared with $49,900 for 2025 Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX. 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. The assessment is based on the specifications shown here; it is not presented as a two-car road test.

Prepared by CarsbySpec from the structured specifications displayed on this page. Missing values are not estimated, and component figures are not treated as directly comparable system figures. Read the methodology.

Specification Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX2025 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD2026
Performance
0-100 km/h6.0 s4.8 s
Top Speed180 km/h201 km/h
Power306 hp351 hp
Torque227 Nm493 Nm
Range & Efficiency
Range75 km574 km
Battery18.1 kWh78.1 kWh
Fuel Tank43 L
Efficiency1.1 L/100km14.7 kWh/100km
CO2 Emissions22 g/km0 g/km
DC Charging250 kW
Size & Capacity
Length4,635 mm4,797 mm
Ground Clearance185 mm175 mm
Cargo490 L854 L
Curb Weight1,910 kg2,003 kg
Towing750 kg1,600 kg
Seats55
Turning Circle10.8 m11.6 m
Starting MSRP$49,900$45,990

Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX vs Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD questions answered

Which is faster, the 2025 Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX or the 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD?

2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD is quicker from 0-100 km/h at 4.8 seconds, versus 6.0 seconds for 2025 Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX.

Which has the higher top speed, the 2025 Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX or the 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD?

2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD has the higher listed top speed at 201 km/h (125 mph), compared with 180 km/h (112 mph).

Which has more horsepower, the 2025 Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX or the 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD?

2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD has more power at 351 hp, a 45 hp advantage over 2025 Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX.

Which has more range, the 2025 Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX or the 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD?

2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD has the longer listed range at 574 km (357 miles), versus 75 km (47 miles).

Which has the larger battery, the 2025 Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX or the 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD?

2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD has the larger listed battery at 78.1 kWh, compared with 18.1 kWh.

Which has more cargo or boot space, the 2025 Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX or the 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD?

2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD has more listed cargo space at 854 litres (30.2 cu ft), versus 490 litres (17.3 cu ft).

Which can tow more, the 2025 Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX or the 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD?

2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD has the higher listed towing capacity at 1,600 kg (3,527 lb), compared with 750 kg (1,653 lb).

Which is heavier, the 2025 Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX or the 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD?

2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD is heavier at 2,003 kg (4,416 lb), while 2025 Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX is listed at 1,910 kg (4,211 lb).

Which is cheaper, the 2025 Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX or the 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD?

2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD has the lower recorded starting MSRP at $45,990 USD, compared with $49,900 USD for 2025 Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX. Regional pricing and equipment can differ.

Which is better, the 2025 Suzuki Across 2.5 PHEV E-Four GLX or the 2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD?

2026 Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. This comparison is based on recorded specifications rather than a road test, so the right choice depends on the buyer's priorities.