Land Rover Range Rover Sport P510e vs Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance
Comparison winners
5 metrics
0-100 winner
Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance
4.9 s
Runner-up: 5.4 s
Range winner
Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance
575 km
Runner-up: 113 km
Power winner
Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance
517 hp
Runner-up: 510 hp
Cargo winner
Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance
655 L
Runner-up: 647 L
Price winner
Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance
$84,990
Runner-up: $106,200
Key differences
- Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance is quicker from 0-100 km/h (4.9 s vs 5.4 s).
- Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance has more range (575 km vs 113 km).
- Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance has more power (517 hp vs 510 hp).
- Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance has more cargo volume (655 L vs 647 L).
| Performance | ||
| 0-100 km/h | 5.4 s | 4.9 s |
| Top Speed | 242 km/h | 180 km/h |
| Power | 510 hp | 517 hp |
| Torque | 750 Nm | 910 Nm |
| Range & Efficiency | ||
| Range | 113 km | 575 km |
| Battery | 38.2 kWh | 107 kWh |
| Fuel Tank | 65 L | — |
| Efficiency | 2.8 L/100km | 18.6 L/100km |
| CO2 Emissions | 62 g/km | 0 g/km |
| DC Charging | 50 kW | 250 kW |
| Size & Capacity | ||
| Length | 4,946 mm | 5,037 mm |
| Ground Clearance | 213 mm | 186 mm |
| Cargo | 647 L | 655 L |
| Curb Weight | 2,640 kg | 2,818 kg |
| Towing | 3,000 kg | 2,200 kg |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Turning Circle | 12.4 m | 12.4 m |
| Starting MSRP | $106,200 | $84,990 |
