Mitsubishi Outlander 2.5 SEL S-AWC vs Volvo C40 Twin Motor
Comparison winners
4 metrics
0-100 winner
Volvo C40 Twin Motor
4.7 s
Runner-up: 9.2 s
Power winner
Volvo C40 Twin Motor
408 hp
Runner-up: 181 hp
Cargo winner
Mitsubishi Outlander 2.5 SEL S-AWC
472 L
Runner-up: 413 L
Price winner
Mitsubishi Outlander 2.5 SEL S-AWC
$35,590
Runner-up: $58,900
Key differences
- Volvo C40 Twin Motor is quicker from 0-100 km/h (4.7 s vs 9.2 s).
- Volvo C40 Twin Motor has more power (408 hp vs 181 hp).
- Mitsubishi Outlander 2.5 SEL S-AWC has more cargo volume (472 L vs 413 L).
- Mitsubishi Outlander 2.5 SEL S-AWC has the lower starting MSRP ($35,590 vs $58,900).
| Performance | ||
| 0-100 km/h | 9.2 s | 4.7 s |
| Top Speed | 185 km/h | 180 km/h |
| Power | 181 hp | 408 hp |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 670 Nm |
| Range & Efficiency | ||
| Range | — | 444 km |
| Battery | — | 79 kWh |
| Fuel Tank | 60 L | — |
| Efficiency | 9 L/100km | 17.8 L/100km |
| CO2 Emissions | 206 g/km | 0 g/km |
| DC Charging | — | 200 kW |
| Size & Capacity | ||
| Length | 4,710 mm | 4,440 mm |
| Ground Clearance | 210 mm | 171 mm |
| Cargo | 472 L | 413 L |
| Curb Weight | 1,750 kg | 2,150 kg |
| Towing | 907 kg | — |
| Seats | 7 | 5 |
| Turning Circle | 10.8 m | 10.8 m |
| Starting MSRP | $35,590 | $58,900 |
