Performance, power and 0-100 km/h
2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD has the quicker recorded 0-100 km/h time at 3.5 seconds, compared with 5.6 seconds for 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro. 2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD has the higher listed output at 595 hp; 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro is rated at 408 hp, a difference of 187 hp. The torque figures follow 2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD at 880 Nm and 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro at 664 Nm. These figures describe straight-line potential only; they do not establish braking performance, ride quality, steering response or durability under repeated hard use.
Range, battery, charging and efficiency
2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro carries the longer listed range at 498 km, against 440 km for 2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD. 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro has the lower recorded consumption at 19.8 kWh/100km; 2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD is listed at 23.2 kWh/100km. 2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD has the higher listed DC charging ceiling at 190 kW, compared with 170 kW. Test cycle, temperature, wheel size and charging conditions can materially affect these results, so only figures measured on the same basis should be treated as directly comparable.
Dimensions, cargo space and towing
2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD provides the larger quoted cargo volume: 863 litres versus 569 litres, a difference of 294 litres. 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro carries the higher towing rating at 2,500 kg, while 2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD is listed at 1,588 kg. 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro is 32 mm longer overall. Exterior size is not a benefit by itself: a longer body may create useful room, but cargo shape, rear-seat space and ease of parking still require a physical inspection.
Price and overall assessment
2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD has the lower listed starting price at $65,600, compared with $75,200 for 2026 Audi Q8 e-tron 55 quattro. 2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. The assessment is based on the specifications shown here; it is not presented as a two-car road test.