Performance, power and 0-100 km/h
2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD has the quicker recorded 0-100 km/h time at 3.5 seconds, compared with 4.7 seconds for 2026 Polestar 3 Long Range Dual Motor. 2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD has the higher listed output at 595 hp; 2026 Polestar 3 Long Range Dual Motor is rated at 489 hp, a difference of 106 hp. The torque figures follow 2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD at 880 Nm and 2026 Polestar 3 Long Range Dual Motor at 840 Nm. These figures describe straight-line potential only; they do not establish braking performance, ride quality, steering response or durability under repeated hard use.
Range, battery, charging and efficiency
2026 Polestar 3 Long Range Dual Motor carries the longer listed range at 610 km, against 440 km for 2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD. 2026 Polestar 3 Long Range Dual Motor has the lower recorded consumption at 18.2 kWh/100km; 2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD is listed at 23.2 kWh/100km. 2026 Polestar 3 Long Range Dual Motor has the higher listed DC charging ceiling at 250 kW, compared with 190 kW. Test cycle, temperature, wheel size and charging conditions can materially affect these results, so only figures measured on the same basis should be treated as directly comparable.
Dimensions, cargo space and towing
2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD provides the larger quoted cargo volume: 863 litres versus 484 litres, a difference of 379 litres. 2026 Polestar 3 Long Range Dual Motor carries the higher towing rating at 2,200 kg, while 2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD is listed at 1,588 kg. 2026 Polestar 3 Long Range Dual Motor is 17 mm longer overall. Exterior size is not a benefit by itself: a longer body may create useful room, but cargo shape, rear-seat space and ease of parking still require a physical inspection.
Price and overall assessment
2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD has the lower listed starting price at $65,600, compared with $73,400 for 2026 Polestar 3 Long Range Dual Motor. 2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. The assessment is based on the specifications shown here; it is not presented as a two-car road test.