Performance, power and 0-100 km/h
2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD has the quicker recorded 0-100 km/h time at 3.5 seconds, compared with 5.2 seconds for 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 9 Long Range AWD. 2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD has the higher listed output at 595 hp; 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 9 Long Range AWD is rated at 380 hp, a difference of 215 hp. The torque figures follow 2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD at 880 Nm and 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 9 Long Range AWD at 700 Nm. These figures describe straight-line potential only; they do not establish braking performance, ride quality, steering response or durability under repeated hard use.
Range, battery, charging and efficiency
2025 Hyundai Ioniq 9 Long Range AWD carries the longer listed range at 570 km, against 440 km for 2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD. 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 9 Long Range AWD has the lower recorded consumption at 19.3 kWh/100km; 2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD is listed at 23.2 kWh/100km. 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 9 Long Range AWD has the higher listed DC charging ceiling at 350 kW, compared with 190 kW. Test cycle, temperature, wheel size and charging conditions can materially affect these results, so only figures measured on the same basis should be treated as directly comparable.
Dimensions, cargo space and towing
2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD provides the larger quoted cargo volume: 863 litres versus 620 litres, a difference of 243 litres. 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 9 Long Range AWD carries the higher towing rating at 2,500 kg, while 2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD is listed at 1,588 kg. 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 9 Long Range AWD is 177 mm longer overall. Exterior size is not a benefit by itself: a longer body may create useful room, but cargo shape, rear-seat space and ease of parking still require a physical inspection.
Price and overall assessment
2025 Hyundai Ioniq 9 Long Range AWD has the lower listed starting price at $56,675, compared with $65,600 for 2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD. The measured categories split evenly, so the better choice depends on which attributes matter most. The assessment is based on the specifications shown here; it is not presented as a two-car road test.