Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD vs Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus

Comparison winners

5 metrics
0-100 winner Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD 3.5 s Runner-up: 6.0 s
Range winner Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD 440 km Runner-up: 42 km
Power winner Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD 595 hp Runner-up: 323 hp
Cargo winner Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD 863 L Runner-up: 854 L
Price winner Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus $42,750 Runner-up: $65,600

How the specs compare

This comparison sets the 2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD against the 2025 Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus. Both belong to the SUV class, so their dimensions, performance and utility figures address a broadly similar type of car. One uses a battery-electric powertrain and the other a plug-in hybrid system, so range and consumption figures need to be read in that context.

Performance, power and 0-100 km/h

2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD has the quicker recorded 0-100 km/h time at 3.5 seconds, compared with 6.0 seconds for 2025 Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus. 2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD has the higher listed output at 595 hp; 2025 Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus is rated at 323 hp, a difference of 272 hp. The torque figures follow 2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD at 880 Nm and 2025 Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus at 500 Nm. These figures describe straight-line potential only; they do not establish braking performance, ride quality, steering response or durability under repeated hard use.

Range, battery, charging and efficiency

2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD carries the longer listed range at 440 km, against 42 km for 2025 Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus. Test cycle, temperature, wheel size and charging conditions can materially affect these results, so only figures measured on the same basis should be treated as directly comparable.

Dimensions, cargo space and towing

2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD provides the larger quoted cargo volume: 863 litres versus 854 litres, a difference of 9 litres. Their listed towing capacities are equal at 1,588 kg. 2025 Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus is 63 mm longer overall. Exterior size is not a benefit by itself: a longer body may create useful room, but cargo shape, rear-seat space and ease of parking still require a physical inspection.

Price and overall assessment

2025 Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus has the lower listed starting price at $42,750, compared with $65,600 for 2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD. 2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. The assessment is based on the specifications shown here; it is not presented as a two-car road test.

Prepared by CarsbySpec from the structured specifications displayed on this page. Missing values are not estimated, and component figures are not treated as directly comparable system figures. Read the methodology.

Specification Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD2026 Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus2025
Performance
0-100 km/h3.5 s6.0 s
Top Speed200 km/h200 km/h
Power595 hp323 hp
Torque880 Nm500 Nm
Range & Efficiency
Range440 km42 km
Battery102 kWh17.8 kWh
Fuel Tank58 L
Efficiency23.2 kWh/100km2.5 L/100km
CO2 Emissions0 g/km57 g/km
DC Charging190 kW
Size & Capacity
Length4,883 mm4,946 mm
Ground Clearance172 mm195 mm
Cargo863 L854 L
Curb Weight2,560 kg2,090 kg
Towing1,588 kg1,588 kg
Seats55
Turning Circle12.2 m12.0 m
Starting MSRP$65,600$42,750

Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD vs Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus questions answered

Which is faster, the 2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD or the 2025 Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus?

2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD is quicker from 0-100 km/h at 3.5 seconds, versus 6.0 seconds for 2025 Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus.

Which has the higher top speed, the 2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD or the 2025 Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus?

Both cars have the same listed top speed of 200 km/h, approximately 124 mph.

Which has more horsepower, the 2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD or the 2025 Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus?

2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD has more power at 595 hp, a 272 hp advantage over 2025 Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus.

Which has more range, the 2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD or the 2025 Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus?

2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD has the longer listed range at 440 km (273 miles), versus 42 km (26 miles).

Which has the larger battery, the 2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD or the 2025 Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus?

2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD has the larger listed battery at 102.0 kWh, compared with 17.8 kWh.

Which has more cargo or boot space, the 2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD or the 2025 Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus?

2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD has more listed cargo space at 863 litres (30.5 cu ft), versus 854 litres (30.2 cu ft).

Which can tow more, the 2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD or the 2025 Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus?

Both cars have the same listed towing capacity of 1,588 kg (3,501 lb).

Which is heavier, the 2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD or the 2025 Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus?

2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD is heavier at 2,560 kg (5,644 lb), while 2025 Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus is listed at 2,090 kg (4,608 lb).

Which is cheaper, the 2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD or the 2025 Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus?

2025 Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus has the lower recorded starting MSRP at $42,750 USD, compared with $65,600 USD for 2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD. Regional pricing and equipment can differ.

Which is better, the 2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD or the 2025 Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus?

2026 Chevrolet Blazer EV SS AWD leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. This comparison is based on recorded specifications rather than a road test, so the right choice depends on the buyer's priorities.