Dodge Hornet R/T PHEV vs Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC

Comparison winners

5 metrics
0-100 winner Dodge Hornet R/T PHEV 6.5 s Runner-up: 7.9 s
Range winner Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC 64 km Runner-up: 53 km
Power winner Dodge Hornet R/T PHEV 288 hp Runner-up: 248 hp
Cargo winner Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC 464 L Runner-up: 398 L
Price winner Dodge Hornet R/T PHEV $39,995 Runner-up: $44,790

How the specs compare

This comparison sets the 2025 Dodge Hornet R/T PHEV against the 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC. Both belong to the SUV class, so their dimensions, performance and utility figures address a broadly similar type of car. Both use plug-in hybrid powertrains, allowing a relatively direct comparison of the recorded energy figures.

Performance, power and 0-100 km/h

2025 Dodge Hornet R/T PHEV has the quicker recorded 0-100 km/h time at 6.5 seconds, compared with 7.9 seconds for 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC. 2025 Dodge Hornet R/T PHEV has the higher listed output at 288 hp; 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC is rated at 248 hp, a difference of 40 hp. The torque figures follow 2025 Dodge Hornet R/T PHEV at 519 Nm and 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC at 450 Nm. These figures describe straight-line potential only; they do not establish braking performance, ride quality, steering response or durability under repeated hard use.

Range, battery, charging and efficiency

2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC carries the longer listed range at 64 km, against 53 km for 2025 Dodge Hornet R/T PHEV. 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC has the lower recorded consumption at 2.0 L/100km; 2025 Dodge Hornet R/T PHEV is listed at 2.6 L/100km. 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC has the higher listed DC charging ceiling at 50 kW, compared with 32 kW. Test cycle, temperature, wheel size and charging conditions can materially affect these results, so only figures measured on the same basis should be treated as directly comparable.

Dimensions, cargo space and towing

2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC provides the larger quoted cargo volume: 464 litres versus 398 litres, a difference of 66 litres. 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC carries the higher towing rating at 1,588 kg, while 2025 Dodge Hornet R/T PHEV is listed at 1,134 kg. 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC is 248 mm longer overall. Exterior size is not a benefit by itself: a longer body may create useful room, but cargo shape, rear-seat space and ease of parking still require a physical inspection.

Price and overall assessment

2025 Dodge Hornet R/T PHEV has the lower listed starting price at $39,995, compared with $44,790 for 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC. The measured categories split evenly, so the better choice depends on which attributes matter most. The assessment is based on the specifications shown here; it is not presented as a two-car road test.

Prepared by CarsbySpec from the structured specifications displayed on this page. Missing values are not estimated, and component figures are not treated as directly comparable system figures. Read the methodology.

Specification Dodge Hornet R/T PHEV2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC2025
Performance
0-100 km/h6.5 s7.9 s
Top Speed200 km/h135 km/h
Power288 hp248 hp
Torque519 Nm450 Nm
Range & Efficiency
Range53 km64 km
Battery15.5 kWh20 kWh
Fuel Tank45 L56 L
Efficiency2.6 L/100km2 L/100km
CO2 Emissions59 g/km46 g/km
DC Charging32 kW50 kW
Size & Capacity
Length4,462 mm4,710 mm
Ground Clearance193 mm203 mm
Cargo398 L464 L
Curb Weight1,858 kg2,035 kg
Towing1,134 kg1,588 kg
Seats57
Turning Circle11.6 m11.0 m
Starting MSRP$39,995$44,790

Dodge Hornet R/T PHEV vs Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC questions answered

Which is faster, the 2025 Dodge Hornet R/T PHEV or the 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC?

2025 Dodge Hornet R/T PHEV is quicker from 0-100 km/h at 6.5 seconds, versus 7.9 seconds for 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC.

Which has the higher top speed, the 2025 Dodge Hornet R/T PHEV or the 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC?

2025 Dodge Hornet R/T PHEV has the higher listed top speed at 200 km/h (124 mph), compared with 135 km/h (84 mph).

Which has more horsepower, the 2025 Dodge Hornet R/T PHEV or the 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC?

2025 Dodge Hornet R/T PHEV has more power at 288 hp, a 40 hp advantage over 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC.

Which has more range, the 2025 Dodge Hornet R/T PHEV or the 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC?

2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC has the longer listed range at 64 km (40 miles), versus 53 km (33 miles).

Which has the larger battery, the 2025 Dodge Hornet R/T PHEV or the 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC?

2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC has the larger listed battery at 20.0 kWh, compared with 15.5 kWh.

Which has more cargo or boot space, the 2025 Dodge Hornet R/T PHEV or the 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC?

2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC has more listed cargo space at 464 litres (16.4 cu ft), versus 398 litres (14.1 cu ft).

Which can tow more, the 2025 Dodge Hornet R/T PHEV or the 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC?

2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC has the higher listed towing capacity at 1,588 kg (3,501 lb), compared with 1,134 kg (2,500 lb).

Which is heavier, the 2025 Dodge Hornet R/T PHEV or the 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC?

2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC is heavier at 2,035 kg (4,486 lb), while 2025 Dodge Hornet R/T PHEV is listed at 1,858 kg (4,096 lb).

Which is cheaper, the 2025 Dodge Hornet R/T PHEV or the 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC?

2025 Dodge Hornet R/T PHEV has the lower recorded starting MSRP at $39,995 USD, compared with $44,790 USD for 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC. Regional pricing and equipment can differ.

Which is better, the 2025 Dodge Hornet R/T PHEV or the 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC?

The measured categories split evenly, so the better choice depends on which attributes matter most. This comparison is based on recorded specifications rather than a road test, so the right choice depends on the buyer's priorities.