Kia Niro EV Wind vs Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine

Comparison winners

5 metrics
0-100 winner Kia Niro EV Wind 7.8 s Runner-up: 8.4 s
Range winner Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine 625 km Runner-up: 460 km
Power winner Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine 220 hp Runner-up: 204 hp
Cargo winner Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine 545 L Runner-up: 475 L
Price winner Kia Niro EV Wind $40,875 Runner-up: $45,500

How the specs compare

This comparison sets the 2025 Kia Niro EV Wind against the 2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine. Both belong to the SUV class, so their dimensions, performance and utility figures address a broadly similar type of car. Both use battery-electric powertrains, allowing a relatively direct comparison of the recorded energy figures.

Performance, power and 0-100 km/h

2025 Kia Niro EV Wind has the quicker recorded 0-100 km/h time at 7.8 seconds, compared with 8.4 seconds for 2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine. 2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine has the higher listed output at 220 hp; 2025 Kia Niro EV Wind is rated at 204 hp, a difference of 16 hp. The torque figures follow 2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine at 300 Nm and 2025 Kia Niro EV Wind at 255 Nm. These figures describe straight-line potential only; they do not establish braking performance, ride quality, steering response or durability under repeated hard use.

Range, battery, charging and efficiency

2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine carries the longer listed range at 625 km, against 460 km for 2025 Kia Niro EV Wind. 2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine has the lower recorded consumption at 13.9 kWh/100km; 2025 Kia Niro EV Wind is listed at 14.1 kWh/100km. 2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine has the higher listed DC charging ceiling at 150 kW, compared with 80 kW. Test cycle, temperature, wheel size and charging conditions can materially affect these results, so only figures measured on the same basis should be treated as directly comparable.

Dimensions, cargo space and towing

2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine provides the larger quoted cargo volume: 545 litres versus 475 litres, a difference of 70 litres. 2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine is 50 mm longer overall. Exterior size is not a benefit by itself: a longer body may create useful room, but cargo shape, rear-seat space and ease of parking still require a physical inspection.

Price and overall assessment

2025 Kia Niro EV Wind has the lower listed starting price at $40,875, compared with $45,500 for 2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine. 2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. The assessment is based on the specifications shown here; it is not presented as a two-car road test.

Prepared by CarsbySpec from the structured specifications displayed on this page. Missing values are not estimated, and component figures are not treated as directly comparable system figures. Read the methodology.

Specification Kia Niro EV Wind2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine2025
Performance
0-100 km/h7.8 s8.4 s
Top Speed167 km/h170 km/h
Power204 hp220 hp
Torque255 Nm300 Nm
Range & Efficiency
Range460 km625 km
Battery64.8 kWh87 kWh
Efficiency14.1 kWh/100km13.9 kWh/100km
CO2 Emissions0 g/km0 g/km
DC Charging80 kW150 kW
Size & Capacity
Length4,420 mm4,470 mm
Ground Clearance160 mm156 mm
Cargo475 L545 L
Curb Weight1,757 kg1,875 kg
Towing750 kg—
Seats55
Turning Circle10.6 m10.8 m
Starting MSRP$40,875$45,500

Kia Niro EV Wind vs Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine questions answered

Which is faster, the 2025 Kia Niro EV Wind or the 2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine?

2025 Kia Niro EV Wind is quicker from 0-100 km/h at 7.8 seconds, versus 8.4 seconds for 2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine.

Which has the higher top speed, the 2025 Kia Niro EV Wind or the 2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine?

2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine has the higher listed top speed at 170 km/h (106 mph), compared with 167 km/h (104 mph).

Which has more horsepower, the 2025 Kia Niro EV Wind or the 2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine?

2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine has more power at 220 hp, a 16 hp advantage over 2025 Kia Niro EV Wind.

Which has more range, the 2025 Kia Niro EV Wind or the 2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine?

2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine has the longer listed range at 625 km (388 miles), versus 460 km (286 miles).

Which has the larger battery, the 2025 Kia Niro EV Wind or the 2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine?

2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine has the larger listed battery at 87.0 kWh, compared with 64.8 kWh.

Which has more cargo or boot space, the 2025 Kia Niro EV Wind or the 2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine?

2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine has more listed cargo space at 545 litres (19.2 cu ft), versus 475 litres (16.8 cu ft).

Which is heavier, the 2025 Kia Niro EV Wind or the 2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine?

2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine is heavier at 1,875 kg (4,134 lb), while 2025 Kia Niro EV Wind is listed at 1,757 kg (3,874 lb).

Which is cheaper, the 2025 Kia Niro EV Wind or the 2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine?

2025 Kia Niro EV Wind has the lower recorded starting MSRP at $40,875 USD, compared with $45,500 USD for 2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine. Regional pricing and equipment can differ.

Which is better, the 2025 Kia Niro EV Wind or the 2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine?

2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. This comparison is based on recorded specifications rather than a road test, so the right choice depends on the buyer's priorities.