Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus vs DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360

Comparison winners

5 metrics
0-100 winner DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360 5.6 s Runner-up: 6.0 s
Range winner DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360 66 km Runner-up: 42 km
Power winner DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360 360 hp Runner-up: 323 hp
Cargo winner Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus 854 L Runner-up: 555 L
Price winner Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus $42,750 Runner-up: $58,000

How the specs compare

This comparison sets the 2025 Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus against the 2025 DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360. Both belong to the SUV class, so their dimensions, performance and utility figures address a broadly similar type of car. Both use plug-in hybrid powertrains, allowing a relatively direct comparison of the recorded energy figures.

Performance, power and 0-100 km/h

2025 DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360 has the quicker recorded 0-100 km/h time at 5.6 seconds, compared with 6.0 seconds for 2025 Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus. 2025 DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360 has the higher listed output at 360 hp; 2025 Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus is rated at 323 hp, a difference of 37 hp. The torque figures follow 2025 DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360 at 520 Nm and 2025 Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus at 500 Nm. These figures describe straight-line potential only; they do not establish braking performance, ride quality, steering response or durability under repeated hard use.

Range, battery, charging and efficiency

2025 DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360 carries the longer listed range at 66 km, against 42 km for 2025 Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus. 2025 DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360 has the lower recorded consumption at 1.6 L/100km; 2025 Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus is listed at 2.5 L/100km. Test cycle, temperature, wheel size and charging conditions can materially affect these results, so only figures measured on the same basis should be treated as directly comparable.

Dimensions, cargo space and towing

2025 Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus provides the larger quoted cargo volume: 854 litres versus 555 litres, a difference of 299 litres. 2025 Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus carries the higher towing rating at 1,588 kg, while 2025 DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360 is listed at 1,500 kg. 2025 Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus is 356 mm longer overall. Exterior size is not a benefit by itself: a longer body may create useful room, but cargo shape, rear-seat space and ease of parking still require a physical inspection.

Price and overall assessment

2025 Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus has the lower listed starting price at $42,750, compared with $58,000 for 2025 DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360. The measured categories split evenly, so the better choice depends on which attributes matter most. The assessment is based on the specifications shown here; it is not presented as a two-car road test.

Prepared by CarsbySpec from the structured specifications displayed on this page. Missing values are not estimated, and component figures are not treated as directly comparable system figures. Read the methodology.

Specification Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus2025 DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 3602025
Performance
0-100 km/h6.0 s5.6 s
Top Speed200 km/h240 km/h
Power323 hp360 hp
Torque500 Nm520 Nm
Range & Efficiency
Range42 km66 km
Battery17.8 kWh14.2 kWh
Fuel Tank58 L55 L
Efficiency2.5 L/100km1.6 L/100km
CO2 Emissions57 g/km36 g/km
Size & Capacity
Length4,946 mm4,590 mm
Ground Clearance195 mm186 mm
Cargo854 L555 L
Curb Weight2,090 kg1,900 kg
Towing1,588 kg1,500 kg
Seats55
Turning Circle12.0 m11.1 m
Starting MSRP$42,750$58,000

Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus vs DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360 questions answered

Which is faster, the 2025 Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus or the 2025 DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360?

2025 DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360 is quicker from 0-100 km/h at 5.6 seconds, versus 6.0 seconds for 2025 Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus.

Which has the higher top speed, the 2025 Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus or the 2025 DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360?

2025 DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360 has the higher listed top speed at 240 km/h (149 mph), compared with 200 km/h (124 mph).

Which has more horsepower, the 2025 Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus or the 2025 DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360?

2025 DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360 has more power at 360 hp, a 37 hp advantage over 2025 Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus.

Which has more range, the 2025 Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus or the 2025 DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360?

2025 DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360 has the longer listed range at 66 km (41 miles), versus 42 km (26 miles).

Which has the larger battery, the 2025 Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus or the 2025 DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360?

2025 Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus has the larger listed battery at 17.8 kWh, compared with 14.2 kWh.

Which has more cargo or boot space, the 2025 Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus or the 2025 DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360?

2025 Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus has more listed cargo space at 854 litres (30.2 cu ft), versus 555 litres (19.6 cu ft).

Which can tow more, the 2025 Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus or the 2025 DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360?

2025 Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus has the higher listed towing capacity at 1,588 kg (3,501 lb), compared with 1,500 kg (3,307 lb).

Which is heavier, the 2025 Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus or the 2025 DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360?

2025 Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus is heavier at 2,090 kg (4,608 lb), while 2025 DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360 is listed at 1,900 kg (4,189 lb).

Which is cheaper, the 2025 Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus or the 2025 DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360?

2025 Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus has the lower recorded starting MSRP at $42,750 USD, compared with $58,000 USD for 2025 DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360. Regional pricing and equipment can differ.

Which is better, the 2025 Mazda CX-70 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV Premium Plus or the 2025 DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360?

The measured categories split evenly, so the better choice depends on which attributes matter most. This comparison is based on recorded specifications rather than a road test, so the right choice depends on the buyer's priorities.