Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC vs DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360

Comparison winners

5 metrics
0-100 winner DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360 5.6 s Runner-up: 7.9 s
Range winner DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360 66 km Runner-up: 64 km
Power winner DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360 360 hp Runner-up: 248 hp
Cargo winner DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360 555 L Runner-up: 464 L
Price winner Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC $44,790 Runner-up: $58,000

How the specs compare

This comparison sets the 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC against the 2025 DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360. Both belong to the SUV class, so their dimensions, performance and utility figures address a broadly similar type of car. Both use plug-in hybrid powertrains, allowing a relatively direct comparison of the recorded energy figures.

Performance, power and 0-100 km/h

2025 DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360 has the quicker recorded 0-100 km/h time at 5.6 seconds, compared with 7.9 seconds for 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC. 2025 DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360 has the higher listed output at 360 hp; 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC is rated at 248 hp, a difference of 112 hp. The torque figures follow 2025 DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360 at 520 Nm and 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC at 450 Nm. These figures describe straight-line potential only; they do not establish braking performance, ride quality, steering response or durability under repeated hard use.

Range, battery, charging and efficiency

2025 DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360 carries the longer listed range at 66 km, against 64 km for 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC. 2025 DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360 has the lower recorded consumption at 1.6 L/100km; 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC is listed at 2.0 L/100km. Test cycle, temperature, wheel size and charging conditions can materially affect these results, so only figures measured on the same basis should be treated as directly comparable.

Dimensions, cargo space and towing

2025 DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360 provides the larger quoted cargo volume: 555 litres versus 464 litres, a difference of 91 litres. 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC carries the higher towing rating at 1,588 kg, while 2025 DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360 is listed at 1,500 kg. 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC is 120 mm longer overall. Exterior size is not a benefit by itself: a longer body may create useful room, but cargo shape, rear-seat space and ease of parking still require a physical inspection.

Price and overall assessment

2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC has the lower listed starting price at $44,790, compared with $58,000 for 2025 DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360. 2025 DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360 leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. The assessment is based on the specifications shown here; it is not presented as a two-car road test.

Prepared by CarsbySpec from the structured specifications displayed on this page. Missing values are not estimated, and component figures are not treated as directly comparable system figures. Read the methodology.

Specification Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC2025 DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 3602025
Performance
0-100 km/h7.9 s5.6 s
Top Speed135 km/h240 km/h
Power248 hp360 hp
Torque450 Nm520 Nm
Range & Efficiency
Range64 km66 km
Battery20 kWh14.2 kWh
Fuel Tank56 L55 L
Efficiency2 L/100km1.6 L/100km
CO2 Emissions46 g/km36 g/km
DC Charging50 kW—
Size & Capacity
Length4,710 mm4,590 mm
Ground Clearance203 mm186 mm
Cargo464 L555 L
Curb Weight2,035 kg1,900 kg
Towing1,588 kg1,500 kg
Seats75
Turning Circle11.0 m11.1 m
Starting MSRP$44,790$58,000

Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC vs DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360 questions answered

Which is faster, the 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC or the 2025 DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360?

2025 DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360 is quicker from 0-100 km/h at 5.6 seconds, versus 7.9 seconds for 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC.

Which has the higher top speed, the 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC or the 2025 DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360?

2025 DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360 has the higher listed top speed at 240 km/h (149 mph), compared with 135 km/h (84 mph).

Which has more horsepower, the 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC or the 2025 DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360?

2025 DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360 has more power at 360 hp, a 112 hp advantage over 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC.

Which has more range, the 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC or the 2025 DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360?

2025 DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360 has the longer listed range at 66 km (41 miles), versus 64 km (40 miles).

Which has the larger battery, the 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC or the 2025 DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360?

2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC has the larger listed battery at 20.0 kWh, compared with 14.2 kWh.

Which has more cargo or boot space, the 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC or the 2025 DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360?

2025 DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360 has more listed cargo space at 555 litres (19.6 cu ft), versus 464 litres (16.4 cu ft).

Which can tow more, the 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC or the 2025 DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360?

2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC has the higher listed towing capacity at 1,588 kg (3,501 lb), compared with 1,500 kg (3,307 lb).

Which is heavier, the 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC or the 2025 DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360?

2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC is heavier at 2,035 kg (4,486 lb), while 2025 DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360 is listed at 1,900 kg (4,189 lb).

Which is cheaper, the 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC or the 2025 DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360?

2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC has the lower recorded starting MSRP at $44,790 USD, compared with $58,000 USD for 2025 DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360. Regional pricing and equipment can differ.

Which is better, the 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SEL S-AWC or the 2025 DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360?

2025 DS 7 E-TENSE 4x4 360 leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. This comparison is based on recorded specifications rather than a road test, so the right choice depends on the buyer's priorities.