Nissan Ariya 63 kWh Advance vs Volvo EX40 Single Motor Extended Range

Comparison winners

5 metrics
0-100 winner Volvo EX40 Single Motor Extended Range 7.3 s Runner-up: 7.9 s
Range winner Volvo EX40 Single Motor Extended Range 476 km Runner-up: 403 km
Power winner Volvo EX40 Single Motor Extended Range 252 hp Runner-up: 218 hp
Cargo winner Nissan Ariya 63 kWh Advance 468 L Runner-up: 452 L
Price winner Nissan Ariya 63 kWh Advance $39,590 Runner-up: $49,900

How the specs compare

This comparison sets the 2025 Nissan Ariya 63 kWh Advance against the 2025 Volvo EX40 Single Motor Extended Range. Both belong to the SUV class, so their dimensions, performance and utility figures address a broadly similar type of car. Both use battery-electric powertrains, allowing a relatively direct comparison of the recorded energy figures.

Performance, power and 0-100 km/h

2025 Volvo EX40 Single Motor Extended Range has the quicker recorded 0-100 km/h time at 7.3 seconds, compared with 7.9 seconds for 2025 Nissan Ariya 63 kWh Advance. 2025 Volvo EX40 Single Motor Extended Range has the higher listed output at 252 hp; 2025 Nissan Ariya 63 kWh Advance is rated at 218 hp, a difference of 34 hp. The torque figures follow 2025 Volvo EX40 Single Motor Extended Range at 420 Nm and 2025 Nissan Ariya 63 kWh Advance at 300 Nm. These figures describe straight-line potential only; they do not establish braking performance, ride quality, steering response or durability under repeated hard use.

Range, battery, charging and efficiency

2025 Volvo EX40 Single Motor Extended Range carries the longer listed range at 476 km, against 403 km for 2025 Nissan Ariya 63 kWh Advance. 2025 Volvo EX40 Single Motor Extended Range has the lower recorded consumption at 14.5 kWh/100km; 2025 Nissan Ariya 63 kWh Advance is listed at 15.6 kWh/100km. 2025 Volvo EX40 Single Motor Extended Range has the higher listed DC charging ceiling at 200 kW, compared with 130 kW. Test cycle, temperature, wheel size and charging conditions can materially affect these results, so only figures measured on the same basis should be treated as directly comparable.

Dimensions, cargo space and towing

2025 Nissan Ariya 63 kWh Advance provides the larger quoted cargo volume: 468 litres versus 452 litres, a difference of 16 litres. 2025 Nissan Ariya 63 kWh Advance is 155 mm longer overall. Exterior size is not a benefit by itself: a longer body may create useful room, but cargo shape, rear-seat space and ease of parking still require a physical inspection.

Price and overall assessment

2025 Nissan Ariya 63 kWh Advance has the lower listed starting price at $39,590, compared with $49,900 for 2025 Volvo EX40 Single Motor Extended Range. 2025 Volvo EX40 Single Motor Extended Range leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. The assessment is based on the specifications shown here; it is not presented as a two-car road test.

Prepared by CarsbySpec from the structured specifications displayed on this page. Missing values are not estimated, and component figures are not treated as directly comparable system figures. Read the methodology.

Specification Nissan Ariya 63 kWh Advance2025 Volvo EX40 Single Motor Extended Range2025
Performance
0-100 km/h7.9 s7.3 s
Top Speed160 km/h180 km/h
Power218 hp252 hp
Torque300 Nm420 Nm
Range & Efficiency
Range403 km476 km
Battery63 kWh69 kWh
Efficiency15.6 kWh/100km14.5 kWh/100km
CO2 Emissions0 g/km0 g/km
DC Charging130 kW200 kW
Size & Capacity
Length4,595 mm4,440 mm
Ground Clearance185 mm176 mm
Cargo468 L452 L
Curb Weight1,870 kg2,000 kg
Towing750 kg
Seats55
Turning Circle11.2 m10.8 m
Starting MSRP$39,590$49,900

Nissan Ariya 63 kWh Advance vs Volvo EX40 Single Motor Extended Range questions answered

Which is faster, the 2025 Nissan Ariya 63 kWh Advance or the 2025 Volvo EX40 Single Motor Extended Range?

2025 Volvo EX40 Single Motor Extended Range is quicker from 0-100 km/h at 7.3 seconds, versus 7.9 seconds for 2025 Nissan Ariya 63 kWh Advance.

Which has the higher top speed, the 2025 Nissan Ariya 63 kWh Advance or the 2025 Volvo EX40 Single Motor Extended Range?

2025 Volvo EX40 Single Motor Extended Range has the higher listed top speed at 180 km/h (112 mph), compared with 160 km/h (99 mph).

Which has more horsepower, the 2025 Nissan Ariya 63 kWh Advance or the 2025 Volvo EX40 Single Motor Extended Range?

2025 Volvo EX40 Single Motor Extended Range has more power at 252 hp, a 34 hp advantage over 2025 Nissan Ariya 63 kWh Advance.

Which has more range, the 2025 Nissan Ariya 63 kWh Advance or the 2025 Volvo EX40 Single Motor Extended Range?

2025 Volvo EX40 Single Motor Extended Range has the longer listed range at 476 km (296 miles), versus 403 km (250 miles).

Which has the larger battery, the 2025 Nissan Ariya 63 kWh Advance or the 2025 Volvo EX40 Single Motor Extended Range?

2025 Volvo EX40 Single Motor Extended Range has the larger listed battery at 69.0 kWh, compared with 63.0 kWh.

Which has more cargo or boot space, the 2025 Nissan Ariya 63 kWh Advance or the 2025 Volvo EX40 Single Motor Extended Range?

2025 Nissan Ariya 63 kWh Advance has more listed cargo space at 468 litres (16.5 cu ft), versus 452 litres (16.0 cu ft).

Which is heavier, the 2025 Nissan Ariya 63 kWh Advance or the 2025 Volvo EX40 Single Motor Extended Range?

2025 Volvo EX40 Single Motor Extended Range is heavier at 2,000 kg (4,409 lb), while 2025 Nissan Ariya 63 kWh Advance is listed at 1,870 kg (4,123 lb).

Which is cheaper, the 2025 Nissan Ariya 63 kWh Advance or the 2025 Volvo EX40 Single Motor Extended Range?

2025 Nissan Ariya 63 kWh Advance has the lower recorded starting MSRP at $39,590 USD, compared with $49,900 USD for 2025 Volvo EX40 Single Motor Extended Range. Regional pricing and equipment can differ.

Which is better, the 2025 Nissan Ariya 63 kWh Advance or the 2025 Volvo EX40 Single Motor Extended Range?

2025 Volvo EX40 Single Motor Extended Range leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. This comparison is based on recorded specifications rather than a road test, so the right choice depends on the buyer's priorities.