Performance, power and 0-100 km/h
2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine has the quicker recorded 0-100 km/h time at 8.4 seconds, compared with 8.8 seconds for 2024 Peugeot e-3008 Long Range. 2024 Peugeot e-3008 Long Range has the higher listed output at 230 hp; 2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine is rated at 220 hp, a difference of 10 hp. The torque figures follow 2024 Peugeot e-3008 Long Range at 343 Nm and 2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine at 300 Nm. These figures describe straight-line potential only; they do not establish braking performance, ride quality, steering response or durability under repeated hard use.
Range, battery, charging and efficiency
2024 Peugeot e-3008 Long Range carries the longer listed range at 700 km, against 625 km for 2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine. 2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine has the lower recorded consumption at 13.9 kWh/100km; 2024 Peugeot e-3008 Long Range is listed at 14.0 kWh/100km. 2024 Peugeot e-3008 Long Range has the higher listed DC charging ceiling at 160 kW, compared with 150 kW. Test cycle, temperature, wheel size and charging conditions can materially affect these results, so only figures measured on the same basis should be treated as directly comparable.
Dimensions, cargo space and towing
2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine provides the larger quoted cargo volume: 545 litres versus 520 litres, a difference of 25 litres. 2024 Peugeot e-3008 Long Range is 72 mm longer overall. Exterior size is not a benefit by itself: a longer body may create useful room, but cargo shape, rear-seat space and ease of parking still require a physical inspection.
Price and overall assessment
2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine has the lower listed starting price at $45,500, compared with $48,500 for 2024 Peugeot e-3008 Long Range. 2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. The assessment is based on the specifications shown here; it is not presented as a two-car road test.