Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine vs Alfa Romeo Tonale PHEV Q4

Comparison winners

5 metrics
0-100 winner Alfa Romeo Tonale PHEV Q4 6.2 s Runner-up: 8.4 s
Range winner Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine 625 km Runner-up: 69 km
Power winner Alfa Romeo Tonale PHEV Q4 280 hp Runner-up: 220 hp
Cargo winner Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine 545 L Runner-up: 422 L
Price winner Alfa Romeo Tonale PHEV Q4 $43,500 Runner-up: $45,500

How the specs compare

This comparison sets the 2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine against the 2025 Alfa Romeo Tonale PHEV Q4. Both belong to the SUV class, so their dimensions, performance and utility figures address a broadly similar type of car. One uses a battery-electric powertrain and the other a plug-in hybrid system, so range and consumption figures need to be read in that context.

Performance, power and 0-100 km/h

2025 Alfa Romeo Tonale PHEV Q4 has the quicker recorded 0-100 km/h time at 6.2 seconds, compared with 8.4 seconds for 2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine. 2025 Alfa Romeo Tonale PHEV Q4 has the higher listed output at 280 hp; 2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine is rated at 220 hp, a difference of 60 hp. The torque figures follow 2025 Alfa Romeo Tonale PHEV Q4 at 520 Nm and 2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine at 300 Nm. These figures describe straight-line potential only; they do not establish braking performance, ride quality, steering response or durability under repeated hard use.

Range, battery, charging and efficiency

2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine carries the longer listed range at 625 km, against 69 km for 2025 Alfa Romeo Tonale PHEV Q4. 2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine has the higher listed DC charging ceiling at 150 kW, compared with 32 kW. Test cycle, temperature, wheel size and charging conditions can materially affect these results, so only figures measured on the same basis should be treated as directly comparable.

Dimensions, cargo space and towing

2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine provides the larger quoted cargo volume: 545 litres versus 422 litres, a difference of 123 litres. 2025 Alfa Romeo Tonale PHEV Q4 is 58 mm longer overall. Exterior size is not a benefit by itself: a longer body may create useful room, but cargo shape, rear-seat space and ease of parking still require a physical inspection.

Price and overall assessment

2025 Alfa Romeo Tonale PHEV Q4 has the lower listed starting price at $43,500, compared with $45,500 for 2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine. 2025 Alfa Romeo Tonale PHEV Q4 leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. The assessment is based on the specifications shown here; it is not presented as a two-car road test.

Prepared by CarsbySpec from the structured specifications displayed on this page. Missing values are not estimated, and component figures are not treated as directly comparable system figures. Read the methodology.

Specification Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine2025 Alfa Romeo Tonale PHEV Q42025
Performance
0-100 km/h8.4 s6.2 s
Top Speed170 km/h206 km/h
Power220 hp280 hp
Torque300 Nm520 Nm
Range & Efficiency
Range625 km69 km
Battery87 kWh15.5 kWh
Fuel Tank—42 L
Efficiency13.9 kWh/100km2.1 L/100km
CO2 Emissions0 g/km48 g/km
DC Charging150 kW32 kW
Size & Capacity
Length4,470 mm4,528 mm
Ground Clearance156 mm192 mm
Cargo545 L422 L
Curb Weight1,875 kg1,780 kg
Towing—1,200 kg
Seats55
Turning Circle10.8 m11.6 m
Starting MSRP$45,500$43,500

Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine vs Alfa Romeo Tonale PHEV Q4 questions answered

Which is faster, the 2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine or the 2025 Alfa Romeo Tonale PHEV Q4?

2025 Alfa Romeo Tonale PHEV Q4 is quicker from 0-100 km/h at 6.2 seconds, versus 8.4 seconds for 2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine.

Which has the higher top speed, the 2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine or the 2025 Alfa Romeo Tonale PHEV Q4?

2025 Alfa Romeo Tonale PHEV Q4 has the higher listed top speed at 206 km/h (128 mph), compared with 170 km/h (106 mph).

Which has more horsepower, the 2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine or the 2025 Alfa Romeo Tonale PHEV Q4?

2025 Alfa Romeo Tonale PHEV Q4 has more power at 280 hp, a 60 hp advantage over 2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine.

Which has more range, the 2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine or the 2025 Alfa Romeo Tonale PHEV Q4?

2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine has the longer listed range at 625 km (388 miles), versus 69 km (43 miles).

Which has the larger battery, the 2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine or the 2025 Alfa Romeo Tonale PHEV Q4?

2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine has the larger listed battery at 87.0 kWh, compared with 15.5 kWh.

Which has more cargo or boot space, the 2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine or the 2025 Alfa Romeo Tonale PHEV Q4?

2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine has more listed cargo space at 545 litres (19.2 cu ft), versus 422 litres (14.9 cu ft).

Which is heavier, the 2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine or the 2025 Alfa Romeo Tonale PHEV Q4?

2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine is heavier at 1,875 kg (4,134 lb), while 2025 Alfa Romeo Tonale PHEV Q4 is listed at 1,780 kg (3,924 lb).

Which is cheaper, the 2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine or the 2025 Alfa Romeo Tonale PHEV Q4?

2025 Alfa Romeo Tonale PHEV Q4 has the lower recorded starting MSRP at $43,500 USD, compared with $45,500 USD for 2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine. Regional pricing and equipment can differ.

Which is better, the 2025 Renault Scenic E-Tech Long Range Esprit Alpine or the 2025 Alfa Romeo Tonale PHEV Q4?

2025 Alfa Romeo Tonale PHEV Q4 leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. This comparison is based on recorded specifications rather than a road test, so the right choice depends on the buyer's priorities.