Performance, power and 0-100 km/h
2026 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC has the quicker recorded 0-100 km/h time at 6.2 seconds, compared with 7.3 seconds for 2026 Toyota C-HR+ Design 77 kWh FWD. 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC has the higher listed output at 292 hp; 2026 Toyota C-HR+ Design 77 kWh FWD is rated at 224 hp, a difference of 68 hp. The torque figures follow 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC at 520 Nm and 2026 Toyota C-HR+ Design 77 kWh FWD at 269 Nm. These figures describe straight-line potential only; they do not establish braking performance, ride quality, steering response or durability under repeated hard use.
Range, battery, charging and efficiency
2026 Toyota C-HR+ Design 77 kWh FWD carries the longer listed range at 607 km, against 444 km for 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC. 2026 Toyota C-HR+ Design 77 kWh FWD has the lower recorded consumption at 13.4 kWh/100km; 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC is listed at 18.1 kWh/100km. 2026 Toyota C-HR+ Design 77 kWh FWD has the higher listed DC charging ceiling at 150 kW, compared with 100 kW. Test cycle, temperature, wheel size and charging conditions can materially affect these results, so only figures measured on the same basis should be treated as directly comparable.
Dimensions, cargo space and towing
2026 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC provides the larger quoted cargo volume: 495 litres versus 416 litres, a difference of 79 litres. Their listed towing capacities are equal at 750 kg. 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC is 164 mm longer overall. Exterior size is not a benefit by itself: a longer body may create useful room, but cargo shape, rear-seat space and ease of parking still require a physical inspection.
Price and overall assessment
2026 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. The assessment is based on the specifications shown here; it is not presented as a two-car road test.