Performance, power and 0-100 km/h
2026 Skoda Elroq 85 has the quicker recorded 0-100 km/h time at 6.6 seconds, compared with 7.3 seconds for 2026 Toyota C-HR+ Design 77 kWh FWD. 2026 Skoda Elroq 85 has the higher listed output at 285 hp; 2026 Toyota C-HR+ Design 77 kWh FWD is rated at 224 hp, a difference of 61 hp. The torque figures follow 2026 Skoda Elroq 85 at 545 Nm and 2026 Toyota C-HR+ Design 77 kWh FWD at 269 Nm. These figures describe straight-line potential only; they do not establish braking performance, ride quality, steering response or durability under repeated hard use.
Range, battery, charging and efficiency
2026 Toyota C-HR+ Design 77 kWh FWD carries the longer listed range at 607 km, against 573 km for 2026 Skoda Elroq 85. 2026 Toyota C-HR+ Design 77 kWh FWD has the lower recorded consumption at 13.4 kWh/100km; 2026 Skoda Elroq 85 is listed at 15.2 kWh/100km. 2026 Toyota C-HR+ Design 77 kWh FWD has the higher listed DC charging ceiling at 150 kW, compared with 135 kW. Test cycle, temperature, wheel size and charging conditions can materially affect these results, so only figures measured on the same basis should be treated as directly comparable.
Dimensions, cargo space and towing
2026 Skoda Elroq 85 provides the larger quoted cargo volume: 470 litres versus 416 litres, a difference of 54 litres. 2026 Skoda Elroq 85 carries the higher towing rating at 1,000 kg, while 2026 Toyota C-HR+ Design 77 kWh FWD is listed at 750 kg. 2026 Toyota C-HR+ Design 77 kWh FWD is 32 mm longer overall. Exterior size is not a benefit by itself: a longer body may create useful room, but cargo shape, rear-seat space and ease of parking still require a physical inspection.
Price and overall assessment
2026 Skoda Elroq 85 leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. The assessment is based on the specifications shown here; it is not presented as a two-car road test.