Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.8 D-4D vs Renault Rafale Atelier Alpine E-Tech Hybrid 200

Comparison winners

4 metrics
0-100 winner Renault Rafale Atelier Alpine E-Tech Hybrid 200 8.4 s Runner-up: 9.1 s
Power winner Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.8 D-4D 204 hp Runner-up: 200 hp
Cargo winner Renault Rafale Atelier Alpine E-Tech Hybrid 200 530 L Runner-up: 456 L
Price winner Renault Rafale Atelier Alpine E-Tech Hybrid 200 $42,900 Runner-up: $48,500

How the specs compare

This comparison sets the 2025 Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.8 D-4D against the 2025 Renault Rafale Atelier Alpine E-Tech Hybrid 200. Both belong to the SUV class, so their dimensions, performance and utility figures address a broadly similar type of car. Both use hybrid powertrains, allowing a relatively direct comparison of the recorded energy figures.

Performance, power and 0-100 km/h

2025 Renault Rafale Atelier Alpine E-Tech Hybrid 200 has the quicker recorded 0-100 km/h time at 8.4 seconds, compared with 9.1 seconds for 2025 Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.8 D-4D. 2025 Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.8 D-4D has the higher listed output at 204 hp; 2025 Renault Rafale Atelier Alpine E-Tech Hybrid 200 is rated at 200 hp, a difference of 4 hp. The torque figures follow 2025 Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.8 D-4D at 500 Nm and 2025 Renault Rafale Atelier Alpine E-Tech Hybrid 200 at 205 Nm. These figures describe straight-line potential only; they do not establish braking performance, ride quality, steering response or durability under repeated hard use.

Range, battery, charging and efficiency

2025 Renault Rafale Atelier Alpine E-Tech Hybrid 200 has the lower recorded consumption at 4.9 L/100km; 2025 Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.8 D-4D is listed at 8.0 L/100km. Test cycle, temperature, wheel size and charging conditions can materially affect these results, so only figures measured on the same basis should be treated as directly comparable.

Dimensions, cargo space and towing

2025 Renault Rafale Atelier Alpine E-Tech Hybrid 200 provides the larger quoted cargo volume: 530 litres versus 456 litres, a difference of 74 litres. 2025 Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.8 D-4D carries the higher towing rating at 3,000 kg, while 2025 Renault Rafale Atelier Alpine E-Tech Hybrid 200 is listed at 1,000 kg. 2025 Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.8 D-4D is 215 mm longer overall. Exterior size is not a benefit by itself: a longer body may create useful room, but cargo shape, rear-seat space and ease of parking still require a physical inspection.

Price and overall assessment

2025 Renault Rafale Atelier Alpine E-Tech Hybrid 200 has the lower listed starting price at $42,900, compared with $48,500 for 2025 Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.8 D-4D. 2025 Renault Rafale Atelier Alpine E-Tech Hybrid 200 leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. The assessment is based on the specifications shown here; it is not presented as a two-car road test.

Prepared by CarsbySpec from the structured specifications displayed on this page. Missing values are not estimated, and component figures are not treated as directly comparable system figures. Read the methodology.

Specification Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.8 D-4D2025 Renault Rafale Atelier Alpine E-Tech Hybrid 2002025
Performance
0-100 km/h9.1 s8.4 s
Top Speed180 km/h182 km/h
Power204 hp200 hp
Torque500 Nm205 Nm
Range & Efficiency
Fuel Tank80 L55 L
Efficiency8 L/100km4.9 L/100km
CO2 Emissions211 g/km112 g/km
Size & Capacity
Length4,925 mm4,710 mm
Ground Clearance221 mm175 mm
Cargo456 L530 L
Curb Weight2,280 kg1,580 kg
Towing3,000 kg1,000 kg
Seats75
Turning Circle12.2 m11.2 m
Starting MSRP$48,500$42,900

Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.8 D-4D vs Renault Rafale Atelier Alpine E-Tech Hybrid 200 questions answered

Which is faster, the 2025 Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.8 D-4D or the 2025 Renault Rafale Atelier Alpine E-Tech Hybrid 200?

2025 Renault Rafale Atelier Alpine E-Tech Hybrid 200 is quicker from 0-100 km/h at 8.4 seconds, versus 9.1 seconds for 2025 Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.8 D-4D.

Which has the higher top speed, the 2025 Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.8 D-4D or the 2025 Renault Rafale Atelier Alpine E-Tech Hybrid 200?

2025 Renault Rafale Atelier Alpine E-Tech Hybrid 200 has the higher listed top speed at 182 km/h (113 mph), compared with 180 km/h (112 mph).

Which has more horsepower, the 2025 Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.8 D-4D or the 2025 Renault Rafale Atelier Alpine E-Tech Hybrid 200?

2025 Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.8 D-4D has more power at 204 hp, a 4 hp advantage over 2025 Renault Rafale Atelier Alpine E-Tech Hybrid 200.

Which has more cargo or boot space, the 2025 Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.8 D-4D or the 2025 Renault Rafale Atelier Alpine E-Tech Hybrid 200?

2025 Renault Rafale Atelier Alpine E-Tech Hybrid 200 has more listed cargo space at 530 litres (18.7 cu ft), versus 456 litres (16.1 cu ft).

Which can tow more, the 2025 Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.8 D-4D or the 2025 Renault Rafale Atelier Alpine E-Tech Hybrid 200?

2025 Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.8 D-4D has the higher listed towing capacity at 3,000 kg (6,614 lb), compared with 1,000 kg (2,205 lb).

Which is heavier, the 2025 Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.8 D-4D or the 2025 Renault Rafale Atelier Alpine E-Tech Hybrid 200?

2025 Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.8 D-4D is heavier at 2,280 kg (5,027 lb), while 2025 Renault Rafale Atelier Alpine E-Tech Hybrid 200 is listed at 1,580 kg (3,483 lb).

Which is cheaper, the 2025 Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.8 D-4D or the 2025 Renault Rafale Atelier Alpine E-Tech Hybrid 200?

2025 Renault Rafale Atelier Alpine E-Tech Hybrid 200 has the lower recorded starting MSRP at $42,900 USD, compared with $48,500 USD for 2025 Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.8 D-4D. Regional pricing and equipment can differ.

Which is better, the 2025 Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.8 D-4D or the 2025 Renault Rafale Atelier Alpine E-Tech Hybrid 200?

2025 Renault Rafale Atelier Alpine E-Tech Hybrid 200 leads in more of the shared headline fields, but that is not a universal verdict: a buyer should weight price, performance, range and utility rather than simply count category wins. This comparison is based on recorded specifications rather than a road test, so the right choice depends on the buyer's priorities.